Five Easy Ways To Tell If An Organization Is Really Values-Driven

A lot of companies claim to be values-driven. They publish their values and use them in marketing messages. However, this does not necessarily mean their values guide decision-making and behaviors company-wide on a day-by-day basis.

To know for sure, you can investigate whether leadership practices and company policies are aligned with their published vision and values. But there’s a simpler and quicker way to tell: pay attention to your own experience as a customer.

Here are five quick ways you can tell if an organization is really values-driven.

1. Employees remember what the company’s values are.

Ask three employees what the values of the company are.

  • Can they quickly recall them?
  • Do they repeat the same values?

I recommend that companies choose no more than five values because you want your values to be forefront in people’s minds, and it’s hard to remember more than five.

Interestingly, Zappos is so totally focused on their values that they have listed ten values that employees actually remember. Check out this great video of Zappos employees talking about their company’s values.

2. Employees can describe specific activities and behaviors that demonstrate what the values look like in action.

Ask the employees to give you examples of how the values they listed are lived in the company –what behaviors or actions do they see that exemplify each of the values?

It’s not enough to just have a list of values. The same words can mean different things to different people. Values like “teamwork” “innovation” or “ownership” need to be clearly defined so they are understood by all and can be implemented consistently.

I recommend including 4 or 5 descriptors to give meaning to the words. For example, one company I worked with defined “ownership” as:

  • When making decisions, ask “Is it good for the customer and is it good for the business?”
  • Empowering one another to push decision making to those closest to the customer whenever possible
  • Enabling everyone to feel ready and committed to stepping into a leadership role when opportunity presents itself
  • Being results driven through measurable success
  • Taking responsibility for success of both individual departments and the whole team
  • Providing descriptors like these enables employees and customers to have clear conversations about what should be happening. And it provides a way to determine whether the values are being lived consistently.

    3. The company’s values are visibly integrated into how they do business and are not just something extra they do on the side.

    It is common knowledge that since its inception, Ben and Jerry’s has built a reputation for caring more about people than profit, providing leadership in social and environmental responsibility. And although the company was sold to Unilever in 2000, CEO Jostein Solheim recently provided reassurance that the essence has not changed, stating

    “The world needs dramatic change to address the social and environmental challenges we are facing. Values led businesses can play a critical role in driving that positive change. We need to lead by example, and prove to the world that this is the best way to run a business. Historically, this company has been and must continue to be a pioneer to continually challenge how business can be a force for good and address inequities inherent in global business.”

    So far Solheim has kept true to his word. If that changes, we consumers will quickly know.

    4. The company’s public message matches your own experience as a customer.

    My advice to companies is Don’t make a claim and then miss the mark, consistently. We consumers resent it and you actually lose credibility.

    Recently in an attempt to resolve a problem with AT&T, I was forced to call customer service five times. Each time I heard this exact phrase at the end of the conversation: “My goal is to provide satisfying customer service. Can I help you with anything else?” Obviously they hadn’t helped me in the first place or I wouldn’t have been forced to call five times on the same issue. When the customer service representative repeats the same canned phrase at end of each conversation, regardless of whether the issue was resolved, the company loses credibility.

    McDonald’s wants to change its image by promoting a new initiative “to help children and families make nutrition-minded choices.” What are they going to do? They’re adding apples to the Happy Meal. As a consumer, I have to say that just doesn’t do it for me.

    In the early 60s, AVIS coined the famous tagline: “We’re only #2 in rental cars, so why go with us? We try harder.” In his April, 2011 article, Alan Armstrong makes the following point:

    Lately AVIS has re-adopted part of that tagline, but only part of it. They’ve dropped the important pre-cursor and kept the memorable ending, “We Try Harder”.  The trouble is, “We try harder” is only believable if your market perceives that you really do try harder. In order to believe that, they have to see you as an underdog. It is very difficult to convince the customer that AVIS, now about the same size as Hertz, will really try harder.

    5. Use your own personal experience to identify the real company values.

    Anyone who has flown on Southwest Airlines can tell you without reading their ads that having fun is one of their core values.

    And indeed, on the careers page of their Website, Southwest Airlines recruits specifically for people who “want the freedom to be creative, dress casually, and have fun on the job.”

    Recently a friend told me of an experience that clearly demonstrates their values: during takeoff the flight attendants announced they were tired and didn’t feel like serving the peanuts and pretzels that day. They had decided to roll them down the aisle during takeoff instead and passengers were welcome to help themselves. And that’s exactly what happened. Passengers grabbed items as they rolled by and had a great time tossing them to each other.

    If you complain about the flight attendants’ creative antics, they will not be reprimanded (as long as safety has not been compromised). Instead, you will be told you’ll be missed if you decide to fly on another airline in the future.

    It’s not very difficult to tell if an organization is really values-driven. What has your experience been recently? Have you observed any values-driven companies in action?

    Corporate culture IS marketing in a digital economy.

    Posted

    Are You an Aardvarks or an Eagle?

    Aardvarks are really good at one thing: eating bugs — sometimes 50,000 in one night! No other creature on the planet can match their appetites. Star performers in their own corner of the jungle, when they tuck a napkin under their aardvark chins, they produce impressive results, just like your hardworking employees can in their jobs.

    Too often, however, in an attempt to do the aardvark and the organization a favor, a decision maker will insist the aardvark fly like an eagle. There are no flying aardvarks. You can certainly throw an aardvark out of an airplane midair, but you won’t end up with a flying aardvark. Being destroyed doesn’t motivate your employees, not the one who just failed or those who witnessed the crash.

    But how do you know the difference between an aardvark and an eagle? How can you recognize those who can and will engage in the critical but difficult work of creating strategy? Whether making a hiring or promotion decision, based on the individual’s proven record of success, ask yourself the following:

    • Does this person understand how to separate strategy from tactics, the “what” from the “how”?
    • Can this person keep a global perspective? Or does she or he become mired in the details and tactics?
    • Do obstacles stop this person?
    • Can he or she create order during chaos?
    • Does this person have the ability to see patterns, make logical connections, resolve contradictions and anticipate consequences?
    • What success has this person had with multitasking?
    • Can this person think on his or her feet?
    • Can this person prioritize seemingly conflicting goals — to zero in on the critical few and put aside the trivial many when allocating time and resources?
    • When facing a complicated or unfamiliar problem, can this individual get to the core of the issue and immediately begin to formulate possible solutions?
    • Is this person future-oriented and able to paint credible pictures of possibilities and likelihoods?
    • How do unexpected and unpleasant changes affect this person’s performance?
    • When in a position of leadership, does this person serve as a source of advice and wisdom?

    The core competencies that drive a particular organization may differ, but the ability to think analytically and dispassionately remains constant. The overarching question is this: “When acting in a strategic role, has this person typically performed as needed?” If the answer is “yes,” the person probably has the innate talent to be a strategic thinker and will just need to improve requisite skills to support the talent. If the answer is “no,” don’t gamble by putting this person in a more demanding position. As valuable as the aardvarks of the organization can be, virtually all organizations need more eagles, strong critical thinkers who can learn from mistakes and make bold decisions.

    It's a shame that so many eagles have to endure aardvark activities throughout the majority of their career in order to 'rise' to positions within US companies where their natural inclinations are finally viewed as assets.

    Posted

    Standard American Diet (SAD) in Pie Chart {pun intended}

    Grains provided nearly 1/4 of daily calories for the average American in 2009. <a href=

    Staggering: the two categories of sweetners and added fats/oils equal more than HALF the calories that the average American consumes each day. And we *wonder* why there is an obesity epidemic???

    Posted

    The Downside of Passion | N2Growth Blog

    Just as there exists a very fine line between brilliance and insanity, there also exists a fine line between passion and many negative traits such as narrow-mindedness, narcissism, fanaticism, delusion, and even paranoia. For instance, there is a big difference in a leader who is passionate about their business, and one that is emotionally over-invested in their business. Passion which is balanced by perspective and reason can reveal purpose, but passion absent those filters can just as easily impede purpose.

    Healthy passion for one’s business actually brings focus and clarity of thought, which serve to accelerate growth and create sustainable success. However being emotionally over-invested in one’s business can lead to irrational decisioning, prideful or ego-driven actions, the use of flawed business logic, and poor execution. These are the regrettable and completely avoidable precursors to unnecessary loss and/or failure.

    Values and integrity need to underpin passion for effective leadership

    Posted

    How Students Use Technology [INFOGRAPHIC]

    Media_httpimagesonlin_pbibp

    Interesting stats about how college students are using their digital devices to study, how it affects their education and well-being.

    Posted

    What Can Social Media Tell Us About American Society? [INFOGRAPHIC]

    Media_http4mshcdncomw_ngxuw

    Nice infographic packed with relevant research on how Americans behave based on their social media usage.

    Posted

    We Stopped Dreaming in the 1970s - Neil deGrasse Tyson

    “First of all, let’s clarify what the NASA budget is. Do you realize that the $850 billion dollar bailout, that sum of money is greater than the entire 50-year running budget of NASA?

    And so when someone says, “We don’t have enough money for this space probe,” I’m asking, no, it’s not that you don’t have enough money, it’s that the distribution of money that you’re spending is warped in some way that you are removing the only thing that gives people something to dream about tomorrow.

    You remember the 60s and 70s. You didn’t have to go more than a week before there’s an article in Life magazine, “The Home of Tomorrow,” “The City of Tomorrow,” “Transportation of Tomorrow”. All of that ended in the 1970s. After we stopped going to the Moon, it all ended. We stopped dreaming.

    And so I worry that the decision that Congress makes doesn’t factor in the consequences of those decisions on tomorrow. Tomorrow’s gone. They’re playing for the quarterly report, they’re playing for the next election cycle, and that is mortgaging the actual future of this nation, and the rest of the world is going to pass us by." Neil deGrasse Tyson

    Posted

    U.S. Education Spending & Student Performance vs. The World {INFOGRAPHIC}

    Media_httpmatusceduwp_yegfs

    The US spends the most money per student, securing a 99% literacy rate yet we are in the lower third of the tables for Math, Science test scores.

    What this infographic does not show is that the US has consistently spent the same amount per student for more than the past decade AND not much has changed in terms of our global position on math & science. Which begs the question about how the US spends their money per student and the ugly truth emerges about the ridiculous amount we spend on administration versus teachers and learning support materials.

    Posted

    10 Cost-Free US Government Actions for Job Growth

    The President says we must create more jobs, yet in the next breath he claims the Government cannot create jobs. One of the main roles of Government is to provide the infrastructure and incentives for continued American economic growth. President Obama has never been employed by corporate America. He either simply doesn't grasp what it takes to create jobs or, perhaps a more sinister twist: blowing up the economy is part of his Marxist agenda to 'overwhelm the system'.

    Now that our credit rating has been downgraded, the US Government will find it more expensive to borrow money which will lead to inflation, even less jobs and more social problems. Even if the US could borrow more money, it appears in the court of public opinion that Americans do not want to continue spending money we simply don't have. The short answer is to create more jobs quickly. Jobs generate revenue for business and taxes to fund government, which is what this country needs in order to pay off our debt and continue to thrive in the 21st century.

    So how can the Federal government create jobs without spending more money? Here are 10 cost-free steps that will quickly lead to new jobs:

    1) Make people cheaper to hire. Replace the 15.3% payroll tax with an 10% national VAT (value-added tax). Repeal Davis-Bacon. Remove minimum wage (remember - this is about jobs. Many employers pay domestic and seasonal help below minimum wage anyway).

    2) Pass free trade agreements. Make it easier to do business with the US.

    3) Simplify the corporate tax code to a straight 5% tax on profits they report to their shareholders. This move alone will keep billions of dollars in the US to generate new job growth.

    4) Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley, Dodd-Frank, and the Federal Credit Card Act.

    5) Cancel all regulations implemented since 2006. Mandate that any new or reinstated regulation have its compliance cost estimated and use the estimate as the budget, just like in business. Audit existing regulations and update their budgets based on reality or eliminate them.

    6) Fund known shortfalls in Social Security and Medicare by the VAT in #1 above, and enforce the limits. Shift grant Medicaid to the States as part of the discretionary budget.

    7) Cut the top individual and small business tax rate down to 25%. Remove ALL deductions and credits except for interest on a mortgage up to $500K on the primary residence only.

    8) Make the corporate tax code territorial so that US corporations can bring profits earned abroad home and invest them here without paying an additional 35% tax on them.

    9) Give every foreign student who earns a degree with math, science or engineering at a US university a green card if they can show proof of employment within six months of graduation. After 10 years of continuous employment, offer citizenship.

    10) Give a green card to any immigrant who comes into America with $500,000+ and uses that money to start a business that employees at least 5 full-time people within one year of arrival.

    So why won't the government enact these cost-free measures before the end of 2011? Discuss.

    Filed under  //  debt   economy   government   jobs  
    Posted

    Which Business Sectors Are Having The Best 2011?

    Media_httpcolumnfivem_qqkaw

    Most profitable businesses in 2011 and those seeing the highest revenue increases over 2010 are not the same.

    Posted